ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
Descriptive comparative morphology of the eye and ocular adnexa in Felidae: observations from a clouded leopard (Neofelis nebulosa), African lion (Panthera leo), and Pallas's cat (Otocolobus manul).
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Felidae family includes diverse species with marked variation in ocular morphology. This study describes and qualitatively compares ocular morphology in a limited number of specimens: the clouded leopard (Neofelis nebulosa, n = 1), the African lion (Panthera leo, including two Angola lions, P. l. bleyenberghi, n = 2), and Pallas’s cat (Otocolobus manul, including O. m. manul, n = 1), whereas morphometric assessment of the orbital region was additionally based on skull material (clouded leopard, n = 1; Pallas’s cat, n = 2; lions, n = 11). MATERIALS AND
methodsMorphometric analyses were performed for the orbital region, eyeball, and selected accessory organs of the eye, using combined macroscopic and microscopic examinations. Histological staining included Mayer’s hematoxylin and eosin, Heidenhain’s Azan trichrome, Movat pentachrome, Masson-Goldner trichrome, Mallory’s trichrome with aniline blue, and Masson-Fontana, as well as histochemical staining with PAS, alcian blue (pH 1.0 and 2.5), alcian blue pH 2.5/PAS, and colloidal iron. Because of the very limited number of specimens, the study was strictly descriptive, and no statistical comparisons were performed.
resultsIn the examined specimens, eyeball size generally corresponded to animal body size, whereas eyeball shape varied among individuals: the examined Angola lions had elliptical eyeballs, the examined clouded leopard had a nearly round eyeball, and the examined Pallas’s cat had a slightly elliptical eyeball. Corneal size and shape varied among the examined individuals. Histologically, the cornea consisted of four layers, Bowman’s layer was absent, and epithelial thickness varied among specimens. Palisades of Vogt were identified in the examined material. The tapetum lucidum varied in size among the examined animals and was most pronounced in the Angola lions; its coloration ranged from milky blue to blue-green. The anterior chamber depth appeared to correspond with eyeball size. Pupil shape also differed among the examined animals. Histological and histochemical analyses of the ocular adnexa revealed interindividual and intertaxon differences in microstructure; however, the very limited material did not allow broader interpretation. Orbital morphometric values generally followed overall skull size. Possible sex-related variation was observed in the lion material, but this requires verification in a larger series.
conclusionThe present study provides a descriptive anatomical and histological characterization of the eye and selected ocular adnexa in a small number of representatives of three felid taxa. These findings may serve as baseline reference data for comparative anatomy and veterinary ophthalmology, but they should not be interpreted as species-level patterns. LIMITATIONS: Due to the limited sample size, these observations are preliminary and do not allow for species-level or population-level inferences. Because ante-mortem ophthalmic examinations were not available, subclinical ocular abnormalities cannot be excluded. In addition, because the material was collected post-mortem and subjected to fixation, processing, and sectioning, some morphometric values may have been affected by tissue distortion or shrinkage. Further studies based on larger series and standardized clinical evaluation are needed to verify the patterns observed in the present material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.