Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42021326›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

First implementation of a collaborative care model for common mental disorders in primary care in France: fidelity of care manager intervention matters.

Nadia Younès, Esther Touitou-Burckard, Emma Ros, Pascal Clerc, Christine Passerieux, Julien Mousquès, Coralie Gandré

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05385666 (Collaborative Mental Health Care Model), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05385666 nacompletednot on this map

Collaborative Mental Health Care Model: an Evaluation of the Implementation of a Pilot in Four Health Homes

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr Nadia YOUNESRan2022 to 2025Enrolled410ConditionsPsychological DisorderArmscollaborative cares
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadia YounèsUniversité Versailles Saint Quentin, Université Paris Saclay, INSERM 1018, Team DevPsy, Villejuif, France. nyounes@ght78sud.fr.
Esther Touitou-BurckardInstitut de recherche et documentation en économie de la santé (Irdes), Paris, France.
Emma RosQuartet Santé, Paris, France.
Pascal ClercUnité de formation et de recherche des Sciences de la Santé Simone-Veil, Département de médecine générale, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France.
Christine PasserieuxUniversité Versailles Saint Quentin, Université Paris Saclay, INSERM 1018, Team DevPsy, Villejuif, France.
Julien MousquèsInstitut de recherche et documentation en économie de la santé (Irdes), Paris, France.
Coralie GandréInstitut de recherche et documentation en économie de la santé (Irdes), Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare for common mental disorders relies on primary care, where they often remain undiagnosed and untreated. The collaborative care model (CoCM) is a team-based approach involving care managers (CMs) who work alongside general practitioners and remote psychiatrists to provide evidence-based mental healthcare. Between 2021 and 2023, a pilot study implemented the CoCM for the first time in France in four primary care practices with nurses with previous professional experience in psychiatry acting as the CMs. As part of the implementation research of this pilot, we analyzed the fidelity of the CM intervention to the original CoCM. We examined CM process of care metrics and explored their association with initial symptom severity and patient outcomes - an aspect rarely addressed in previous international implementation research on the CoCM.

methodsUsing electronic medical records, we calculated several fidelity measures for CM intervention, including early intervention (time to first intervention), intensity of care (number of visits and intervention duration) and evidence-based care (type of care provided). We also examined potential variations according to initial symptom severity, in line with a stepped-care approach. Patient outcomes, particularly depression response and remission, were analyzed according to initial symptom severity and fidelity measures.

resultsA total of 235 patients were included in the study. Overall, the care provided by CMs aligned with the original CoCM, in terms of early intervention, intensive care, and type of evidence-based care delivered. It was also adjusted according to patients' initial symptom severity, in particular for early intervention, in line with a stepped-care approach. Higher fidelity of the CM intervention to the CoCM - especially shorter time to treatment initiation and number of visits - was associated with better patient outcomes.

conclusionsThe CoCM shows promise for improving the treatment of common mental disorders in French primary care within a stepped-care framework. Its extension will require ensuring high fidelity of the CM intervention to the model in real-world settings, as it appears crucial for achieving optimal patient outcomes. These findings also provide useful lessons for other countries implementing the CoCM. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareAdultCooperative BehaviorFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsCare managerCollaborative care modelCommon mental disordersFranceImplementation researchIntegrated careMultidisciplinary group practicesPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID42021326
PMCPMC13244881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.