ArticleBMC medical education2026
Pre-tertiary academic preparation, psychological preparedness, and academic performance among nursing students in Ghana: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcademic performance in nursing and midwifery students is a significant feature determining the quality of training and workforce readiness. Although some studies have emphasised the admission process and institutional factors as the main determinants of academic performance, less has been revealed about the association of pre-tertiary educational background with academic performance after the students’ enrolment. Few studies in sub-Saharan Africa have integrated objective pre-tertiary academic indicators with psychological preparedness constructs within a theoretically grounded framework.
objectiveThis study assessed the link between senior high school (SHS) background and academic readiness and the academic performance of nursing and midwifery students in Ghana.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 345 nursing and midwifery students at a public training institution in Ghana. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire capturing socio-demographic characteristics, SHS background, academic preparedness, institutional support, and academic outcomes. Last-semester grade point average (GPA) was analysed as an ordered categorical outcome using ordinal logistic regression.
resultsParticipants reported moderate levels of academic preparedness, with mean scores of 3.55 (SD = 0.55) for science self-efficacy, 3.38 (SD = 0.54) for language proficiency, 3.63 (SD = 0.49) for study strategies, 3.73 (SD = 0.54) for grit and time management, and 3.68 (SD = 0.58) for institutional support. The ordinal regression model indicated a good general fit to the data (Likelihood Ratio χ² = 374.64, p < .001). When compared to the other two circumstances, the student’s background was found to be a predictor of their academic performance, as the General Science (p < .001) and Agricultural Science (p = .010) students’ occurrences of having the better GPA categories were higher than their counterparts. On the other hand, the composite WASSCE scores, science self-efficacy self-reported measures, and academic language proficiency, study strategies, grit, time management, and institutional support were not associated with GPA after adjustment independently.
conclusionNursing and midwifery students’ steps up in education seem to be achieved mostly through different paths of schooling-level possibilities rather than through individually felt readiness. Additionally, the integration of the results of this study with proper coordination between undergraduate and secondary education will significantly enhance the production of efficient learning outcomes and strengthen the nursing profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.