ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
Ethnozoological study of medicinal animals used in traditional healthcare in Andracha District, Ethiopia.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedicinal animals are integral to traditional healthcare worldwide, yet ethnozoological knowledge in many Ethiopian regions remains under-documented. This study documented the diversity of medicinal animals, associated cultural knowledge, preparation methods, and conservation implications among communities in Andracha District, Ethiopia.
methodsA cross-sectional ethnobiological survey was conducted from January to August 2025 using semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and field observations. Sixty-five informants participated, including 25 key informants purposively selected and 40 general participants randomly chosen. FGDs refined data collection instruments and validated traditional knowledge. Quantitative indices Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC), Informant Consensus Factor (ICF), Fidelity Level (FL), and Zoological Ethnoknowledge Index (ZEI) summarized knowledge patterns, species importance, and cultural reliability. Jaccard Similarity Index (JSI) and Rahman's Similarity Index (RSI) assessed cross-community similarity. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, ANOVA, and linear regression, explored variations across gender, age, education, and experience using R software.
resultsA total of 52 medicinal animal species were documented in Andracha District. Bos taurus, Apis mellifera, and Halictus scabiosae exhibited the highest RFC values. ICF ranged from 0.60 to 0.97, with the strongest agreement observed for respiratory and gastrointestinal ailments. The highest FL was recorded for Capra aegagrus hircus (FL = 83.3%), followed by Apis mellifera (FL = 77.8%). Knowledge of medicinal animals varied significantly with age, gender, literacy, and healer experience (P < 0.05). Major threats to medicinal fauna included agricultural expansion, overgrazing, and overexploitation, while indigenous conservation practices such as sacred forest protection and community stewardship were actively maintained.
conclusionMedicinal animals are crucial for healthcare, cultural identity, and livelihoods in Andracha District. Environmental pressures and generational gaps threaten both species and associated knowledge. Strengthening community-based conservation, sustainable harvesting, and intergenerational knowledge transmission is essential to safeguard this biocultural heritage. The study documents traditional practices but does not endorse ingestion or application of potentially hazardous animal products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.