ArticleBMC health services research2026
Turning waiting time to action: co-designing solutions to support families waiting for appointments in an Australian metropolitan child development service.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong wait times for child development services are a widespread issue internationally, hindering timely access to early support. This study reports on a co-design project at a public child development service for children aged 0–16 years in a major Australian city. The study aimed to 1) understand parents’/carers’ and staff perspectives on waiting for an initial child development appointment, and 2) co-design and implement strategies to better support families during this waiting period.
methodsGuided by a co-design research approach, a convergent mixed methods, multi-phased design was used. In Phase 1, online surveys captured parents’/carers’ experiences of being on the waiting list (n = 450), and parent/carer and staff perspectives (n = 43) on how families could be better supported. Key strategies for supporting families were identified. In Phase 2, a prioritisation survey (n = 54) and focus groups/interviews (n = 5) were used to develop and prioritise strategies with parents/carers. Strategies were reviewed for feasibility and actions aligned with the strategies were implemented within the service in Phase 3.
resultsIn Phase 1, participants identified opportunities for families to take steps while waiting for a child development appointment, and reported factors that made this easier or more challenging. Strategies identified from open-ended responses were taken into Phase 2. Phase 2 yielded six prioritised strategies: (1) Provide a summary and action plan for families after phone call, (2) Check in regularly with families while they wait and provide ongoing recommendations, (3) Help families understand ‘the system’, (4) Provide resources and strategies to help families support their child’s development at home, (5) Help families prepare for their first appointment, (6) Support parent mental health and understanding of how they can advocate for their child. Examples of actions implemented in Phase 3 included development of an animated service information video, and updated documentation for families following their intake call.
conclusionsCombining the lived experience of parents/carers with the expertise of multidisciplinary staff, service leadership, and researchers in a co-design project led to feasible solutions being implemented to better support families while they wait for an initial child development appointment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.