ArticleBMC surgery2026
Digital measurement and safety parameter analysis of the infra-acetabular screw pathway.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate acetabular anatomy using digital technology, determine the limiting parameters for infra-acetabular screw placement in the Chinese population, and provide a theoretical basis for clinical surgery.
methodsWe collected CT data from 100 adult pelvic plain scans performed at the Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between 2020 and 2023. Three-dimensional models were reconstructed using Mimics software. The mid-pubic axial projection area was identified at the pelvic inlet. Simulated screw insertion procedures measured the following parameters: length and diameterthe of screw, medial distance (OA) and anterior distance (AP) from the entry point to the apex of the iliopubic eminence, as well as the angles formed by the screw axis with the pelvic coronal and sagittal planes.
resultsThe mean length of the infra-acetabular screw pathway was 101.51 ± 4.87 mm in males and 91.63 ± 3.64 mm in females. The maximum screw diameter was 5.39 ± 1.25 mm in males and 4.55 ± 0.89 mm in females.The medial distance from the entry point to the iliopubic eminence was 11.09 ± 2.70 mm in males and 11.47 ± 3.46 mm in females; the anterolateral distance was 8.22 ± 3.68 mm in males and 7.32 ± 2.66 mm in females.The angle between the screw axis below the acetabulum and the coronal plane was 55.20° ± 5.40° in males and 53.30° ± 6.30° in females. The angle with the sagittal plane was 12.60° ± 9.80° in males and 2.60° ± 8.80° in females. Except for the angle with the coronal plane and the OA and AP value, all other parameters showed significant gender differences (P < 0.01).Among the 100 pelvic models collected in this study, 47 cases had a minimum screw insertion channel diameter ≥ 5 mm; while 5 cases had a minimum screw insertion diameter < 3.5 mm (1 male, 4 females).
conclusionThis study demonstrates gender-dependent differences in both screw length and maximum diameter within the infra-acetabular approach. We recommend preoperative 3D reconstruction simulation to determine safe and effective maximum channel parameters for infra-acetabular screw placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.