SynthesisBMC public health2026
A systematic review of social media use among rural US adolescents and associated health outcomes.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing early effects of Australia's Social Media Minimum Age Act on adolescents' social media use: observational study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding social media use among rural adolescents is important because they are a geographically and socially isolated population which may impact how they use social media and affect the impacts of use. The goal of this study was to systematically review and evaluate the literature on rural US adolescent social media use. Specifically, what is known about their social media use, amount and type of use, and the associations between social media use and health outcomes.
methodsA systematic search was conducted on seven databases: PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO (ProQuest), Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they sampled rural US populations, sampled adolescents (ages 10–19), and had at least one of the following as an outcome: how much adolescents use social media, how adolescents are using social media including content, and/or whether social media use was associated with a health outcome.
resultsA total of 34 articles matched the inclusion criteria and were included in analysis (N = 22,315). Results suggest that rural US adolescents use social media to the same extent as non-rural adolescents. Rural adolescents with marginalized identities rely on social media to form connections with those with shared identities outside of their geographic area. Social media also fostered an environment for harmful connections, as numerous studies reported cyberbullying. In respect to mental health, using social media was found to be an avenue for coping with anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, increased time spent on social media did not reduce existing feelings of nervousness, anxiety, depression, or stress in the pandemic. Interventional studies indicated that social media was successfully used as a tool to disseminate health information and provide support to marginalized groups amongst the already hard-to-reach population of rural adolescents.
conclusionsThis systematic review highlights the lack of research dedicated to social media use amongst rural US adolescents, despite high prevalence of use. More research on the specific popularity of platforms and content consumed is needed to understand the nuanced effects of social media and to further investigate social media usage as a potential intervention target for this geographically and socially isolated population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.