Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42021240›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2026

A systematic review of social media use among rural US adolescents and associated health outcomes.

Michelle Moufawad, Sarah DeLapp, Simone T Rhodes, Kelsey L Rose, Sarah E Domoff, Meredith Kells, Jeffrey M Hunger, Logan Wallace, Summer Brewer, Anna Coleman and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michelle MoufawadCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA.
Sarah DeLappCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA.
Simone T RhodesCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA.
Kelsey L RoseCollege of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
Sarah E DomoffDepartment of Psychology, University at Albany, Albany, NY, 12222, USA.
Meredith KellsUniversity of Rochester School of Nursing, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
Jeffrey M HungerDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, 45056, USA.
Logan WallaceCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA.
Summer BrewerCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA.
Anna ColemanCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA.
Allison RakowskiCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA.
Natalie AguilarCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA.
Samantha L HahnCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA. Sam.Hahn@cmich.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding social media use among rural adolescents is important because they are a geographically and socially isolated population which may impact how they use social media and affect the impacts of use. The goal of this study was to systematically review and evaluate the literature on rural US adolescent social media use. Specifically, what is known about their social media use, amount and type of use, and the associations between social media use and health outcomes.

methodsA systematic search was conducted on seven databases: PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO (ProQuest), Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they sampled rural US populations, sampled adolescents (ages 10–19), and had at least one of the following as an outcome: how much adolescents use social media, how adolescents are using social media including content, and/or whether social media use was associated with a health outcome.

resultsA total of 34 articles matched the inclusion criteria and were included in analysis (N = 22,315). Results suggest that rural US adolescents use social media to the same extent as non-rural adolescents. Rural adolescents with marginalized identities rely on social media to form connections with those with shared identities outside of their geographic area. Social media also fostered an environment for harmful connections, as numerous studies reported cyberbullying. In respect to mental health, using social media was found to be an avenue for coping with anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, increased time spent on social media did not reduce existing feelings of nervousness, anxiety, depression, or stress in the pandemic. Interventional studies indicated that social media was successfully used as a tool to disseminate health information and provide support to marginalized groups amongst the already hard-to-reach population of rural adolescents.

conclusionsThis systematic review highlights the lack of research dedicated to social media use amongst rural US adolescents, despite high prevalence of use. More research on the specific popularity of platforms and content consumed is needed to understand the nuanced effects of social media and to further investigate social media usage as a potential intervention target for this geographically and socially isolated population.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorRural PopulationSocial MediaAdolescentCOVID-19Digital MediaHumansMedia ExposureUnited StatesAdolescentsHealth OutcomesInterventionsRuralSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID42021240
PMCPMC13244971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.