ArticleBMC oral health2026
Association of mandibular third molar positions, ramus height, and gonial angle on panoramic radiographs: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the positions of impacted mandibular third molars and the gonial angle and ramus height, as measured on panoramic radiographs, according to the Pell and Gregory/Winter classifications.
methodsThis retrospective study included panoramic radiographs of 700 patients (350 males and 350 females) aged 18–62 years, who presented with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars. The gonial angle and ramus height were measured, and the position of the impacted third molars was categorized based on the Pell and Gregory/Winter classification systems.
resultsThe most common third molar impaction position observed was vertical, followed by mesioangular and horizontal positions. The study found that a high gonial angle was more frequently observed in males, while a low gonial angle was more common in females. No significant association was identified between the type of mandibular third molar impaction and the gonial angle or ramus height. Additionally, individuals with high gonial angles had lower ramus heights. Individuals with impacted teeth in the “other” position had statistically higher gonial angles (p < 0.05).
conclusionThe study concludes that there is no significant correlation between the gonial angle, ramus height, and the type of mandibular third molar impaction. However, individuals with impacted teeth in the “other” position were found to have higher gonial angles, which may increase the risk of mandibular fractures. These findings show that although certain impaction types are more prevalent, mandibular anatomical parameters such as gonial angle and ramus height do not appear to significantly influence impaction patterns when assessed on panoramic radiographs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.