ArticleBMC public health2026
Cancer screening discrepancies among Black people in Canada: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer is a major cause of death in Canada, and Black people in Canada experience notable disparities in screening. This scoping review summarises existing evidence on cancer screening among Black people in Canada and identifies key barriers, facilitators, and implications for policy and practice.
methodsThe review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review framework and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. We conducted a systematic search of Sociological Abstracts, SocINDEX, PsychINFO, Embase, Social Science Citation Index, Social Work Abstracts, CINAHL, Scopus, Gender Studies Database, PubMed, ProQuest, and Web of Science. Articles were included if they focused on cancer screening among Black people in Canada, excluding literature reviews and grey literature. Data extraction covered study characteristics, screening methods, rates, and identified barriers and facilitators.
resultsNineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, with a geographical concentration in Ontario (11 studies), followed by Nova Scotia (3), Alberta (2), and Quebec (1). The studies predominantly addressed cervical (58%) and breast cancer (26%), utilizing cross-sectional and retrospective cohort designs. Key barriers to screening included socioeconomic constraints, cultural stigmas, and structural racism within the healthcare system. Recommended interventions included culturally sensitive education, patient navigation services, and advanced screening technologies.
conclusionsSignificant disparities in cancer screening rates persist among Black people in Canada due to systemic, cultural, and socioeconomic barriers. Tailored interventions and equitable policies are needed to improve access and participation in screening services. Future research should prioritise longitudinal studies and incorporate comprehensive socioeconomic and cultural data to better inform strategies that support early detection and reduce cancer-related mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.