ArticleBMC medical education2026
Deciphering AI-chatbots utilization in clinical practice, research and education among Chinese medical students in generative AI era: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence chatbots (AI-chatbots) are increasingly being applied in the medical field; however, their specific utilization in Chinese medical education and practice remains poorly understood. This study aims to systematically analyze the perception and utilization of AI-chatbots among Chinese medical students, explore potential factors influencing their effectiveness, and provide recommendations for policy development and technological optimization.
methodsThis cross-sectional study utilized an electronic questionnaire distributed through multiple channels to collect data from Chinese medical students, with most participants recruited from Guangdong Province, Southern China. The questionnaire assessed demographic characteristics, AI-chatbot usage patterns, attitudes towards their application in clinical, research, and educational domains, and perspectives on potential issues. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, chi-square tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Logistic regressions and Pearson correlation analyses.
resultsAmong 414 respondents, 53.6% had used AI-chatbots, primarily ChatGPT (58%). AI-chatbots were favored for research (36.5%) and education (40.1%), with limited use in clinical practice (4.5%). Users' evaluations of AI-chatbots in research and education were significantly more positive than those of non-users. Use frequency, time, and attention to updates demonstrated significant positive correlations with positive responses (P < 0.05). Information accuracy emerged as a top concern, with over 65% of respondents indicating the urgency for a solution.
conclusionOur findings indicate that AI-chatbots are widely utilized particularly in research and educational-related domains among Chinese medical students, with our sample most recruited from Southern China. However, the implementation of AI-chatbots in clinical practice continues to face significant challenges. Medical students exhibit a cautiously optimistic attitude towards AI-chatbots, acknowledging their potential while remaining cognizant of associated risks. Future research should prioritize investigating the safety and efficacy of AI-chatbots in clinical practice, as well as exploring optimal strategies for their integration into the medical education curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.