ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers regarding oral healthcare during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study among obstetricians in Guangxi, China.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaternal oral health is closely linked to pregnancy outcomes, yet its integration into prenatal care remains inadequate, particularly in resource-limited regions like Guangxi, China. Obstetricians, as primary caregivers for pregnant women, play a critical role in bridging this gap. This study aimed to evaluate their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding oral healthcare during pregnancy, identify service barriers, and analyze the interrelationships among these factors.
methodsA cross-sectional, online questionnaire-based study was conducted from Nov 2024 to Jan 2025 among licensed obstetricians in Guangxi.The questionnaire assessed demographic characteristics and four key dimensions: knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers related to oral healthcare during pregnancy. Data were analyzed using multivariable descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages) and inferential methods (Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman correlation, and multiple linear regression).
resultsAmong 532 participants, 526 returned valid surveys (98.9% response rate). Only 179 (34.0%) had received oral health training. Mean scores were: knowledge 9.68/16, attitude 32.18/40, practice 18.61/30, and barriers 28.09/40. Knowledge strongly correlated with attitude (r = 0.668, P <0.001), weakly with practice (r = 0.116, P <0.001), and positively with barriers (r = 0.341, P <0.001). Due to the cross-sectional design, causality cannot be inferred; notably, knowledge alone poorly predicts practice. The weak knowledge-practice association further indicates that knowledge alone is insufficient to predict service utilization.
conclusionsObstetricians in Guangxi demonstrated moderate knowledge and positive attitudes toward perinatal oral healthcare; however, their clinical engagement remained limited and substantial service barriers were reported. These findings underscore the urgent need for developing interdisciplinary clinical guidelines between obstetrics and dentistry, establishing specialized oral health training programs tailored for obstetricians, and systematically integrating oral health screening into routine antenatal care protocols to bridge the knowledge-practice gap and enhance the quality of perinatal oral health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.