Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42021168›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2026

Exploring contemporary views on Green Care Farms from a Canadian perspective.

Jennifer M Harris, Marie-Lee Yous, Talitha Ling, Ashley Smith, Paulette V Hunter, Abigail Wickson-Griffiths, Anthea Innes, Megan Campbell, Habib Chaudhury, Tianci Dong and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jennifer M HarrisSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. hastinj@mcmaster.ca.
Marie-Lee YousSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Talitha LingSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Ashley SmithSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Paulette V HunterDepartment of Psychology, St. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Abigail Wickson-GriffithsFaculty of Nursing, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.
Anthea InnesGilbrea Centre for Studies in Aging, Faculty of Social Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Megan CampbellSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Habib ChaudhuryDepartment of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Tianci DongDepartment of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Vanina Dal Bello-HaasSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Rebekah ChurchyardGreen Care Farms Inc, Milton, ON, Canada.
Sharon KaasalainenSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGreen Care Farms (GCFs) are an emerging model of dementia care that integrate agricultural and outdoor activities into care environments and have demonstrated benefits for quality of life internationally. Despite growing interest, GCFs have not been implemented within Canadian long-term care (LTC) settings. This study aimed to explore interest holder perceptions regarding the feasibility, benefits, and challenges of implementing GCFs as a residential dementia care model in Canada.

methodsA qualitative descriptive design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten interest holders in Ontario and Saskatchewan, including LTC administrators, executives, policymakers, and family care partners. Interviews were conducted in person, by telephone, or via videoconferencing, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, following an iterative process of coding, theme development, and review to identify patterns of meaning across participant accounts.

resultsFour overarching themes were identified: social and engaging care, safety concerns, barriers to implementation, and infrastructure considerations. Participants viewed GCFs as having strong potential to enhance quality of life for people living with dementia through meaningful activity, social connection, and person-centred approaches, including reframing long-term care as a place to live rather than solely a place to die. However, significant concerns were raised regarding resident safety, risk management, and infection control, particularly in relation to outdoor environments and animals. Perceived barriers included restrictive funding models, legislative and policy constraints, and regulatory requirements that limit innovation within LTC. Discussion of infrastructure considerations highlighted the need for creative architectural design, appropriate staffing models, and additional resources to support land and animal care alongside clinical services.

conclusionsInterest holders viewed GCFs as a promising and innovative approach to residential dementia care in Canada, but identified substantial system-level, regulatory, and funding barriers to implementation. Addressing these challenges will require policy reform, flexible funding mechanisms, and further research examining feasibility, safety, and outcomes within the Canadian LTC context.

Indexed as

DementiaFarmsLong-Term CareQuality of LifeCanadaFemaleHumansMaleOntarioQualitative ResearchSaskatchewanDementia CareGreen Care FarmsInterest Holder PerceptionsLong-Term CarePerson-Centred Care

Identifiers

PMID42021168
PMCPMC13238013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.