ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026
The Cartesian Gaussian additive noise model for directed network inference in omics data.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccess to omics datasets, such as single-cell RNA-sequencing, enables us to estimate the regulatory networks governing the differentiation, proliferation, and interaction of cells in our body. Knowledge of such networks can give us valuable insight on the structure and progression of diseases; the difficulty is in estimating them. Most methods that estimate these networks either make an independence assumption (‘the cells in your body do not interact’), or ignore the directional nature of gene regulation. METHODOLOGY: In this paper, we introduce the Cartesian Linear Gaussian Additive Noise Model to learn both cell-cell and gene-gene interactions. Our method is a statistical method; it is fit with maximum likelihood estimation, and we prove that a unique optimum always exists (under certain assumptions) using tools from high-dimensional statistics.
resultsOur method differs from prior work in its lack of an independence assumption; we show that this leads to a real improvement in gene regulatory network and cell network reconstructions relative to analogous independence-assuming methods.
conclusionsWe have developed and proved viable a novel method that learns directed gene regulatory networks, without assuming independence of cells. Our method is also extensible to more complicated omics datasets, such as longitudinal bulk RNA-sequencing datasets, through its ability to handle ‘tensor-variate’ datasets.
trial registrationClinical trial number: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.