ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Tracking the impact of bottom trawling on benthic habitat status.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tracking the impact of bottom trawling on benthic habitat status.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bottom trawling is the most widespread physical disturbance to marine benthic habitats, yet broadscale assessments of its impact remain limited. We developed a quantitative framework to evaluate trawling effects on benthic habitats at broad spatial scales based on the sentinels of seabed (SoS) indicator. We applied this approach across five broad benthic habitat types in the Bay of Biscay and the Gulf of Cádiz, two regions that are subject to substantial trawling pressure. Using data from over 2000 monitoring locations, we assessed habitat sensitivity to trawling through generalized additive models (GAMs) and the SoS indicator, which quantifies benthic habitat quality based on the proportion of sentinel species (i.e., species typical of the habitat and sensitive to the pressure). We also sought to establish scientifically grounded quality thresholds to assess bottom-trawling impacts by applying three complementary approaches: distance to degradation, natural variation, and detectable change. We conducted a temporal analysis to evaluate changes in trawling impacts over time. Impact assessments varied depending on the method used to determine thresholds, although the natural variation and distance to degradation approaches yielded consistent results. Despite the methodological differences, all approaches identified offshore circalittoral mud and offshore circalittoral mixed sediments as the most affected habitats. The Gulf of Cádiz had more overall impacts than northern Spain. Impacts decreased significantly across all benthic habitats in association with declining trawling intensity, although extensive areas remained at risk. Our approach provides a scalable and robust way to assess seabed condition at broad spatial scales. By establishing critical benchmarks for habitat quality and pressure, it offers a scientifically sound tool to inform national and regional marine management strategies. The approach supports the implementation of environmental policies, such as the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive, and contributes to achieving good environmental status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.