Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42020912›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Applications of Fundus-Tracked Perimetry in the Assessment of Visual Sensitivity.

Alexis Ceecee Britten-Jones, Janise Dagelet, Lauren N Ayton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexis Ceecee Britten-JonesDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. ac.brittenjones@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1101-2870
Janise DageletDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Lauren N AytonDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fundus-tracked perimetry, also called microperimetry, is increasingly used as an outcome measure in retinal gene therapy clinical trials. By combining static automated perimetry and real-time fundus tracking, fundus-tracked perimetry enables accurate assessment of visual sensitivity in the central retina to precisely identify areas of impaired or preserved function.This chapter describes the clinical methods used to perform fundus-tracked perimetry and strategies to improve the reliability of fundus-tracked perimetry measurements, including operator training, patient preparation, and test monitoring.

Indexed as

Fundus OculiRetinaVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsHumansFundus-tracked perimetryMacular sensitivityMicroperimetryPerimetryRetinal sensitivityVisual function

Identifiers

PMID42020912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.