ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2026
Leaf mold extract agar facilitates recovery of soil bacterial diversity beyond Bacillus dominance.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dominance of Bacillus species on conventional agar often hampers the recovery of diverse soil bacteria ("Bacillus dominance"). To address this, we developed an agar medium containing leaf mold extract (LME) and evaluated its effectiveness for soil microorganism isolation compared to conventional yeast malt extract agar (YME agar). The 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed that YME agar cultures were dominated by Bacillus-related bacteria, while LME agar enabled the growth of a broader range of taxa, especially actinomycetes like Streptomyces. LME agar supported higher bacterial diversity even in samples with high Bacillus abundance. Some LME isolates had very low 16S rRNA gene similarity to known species or could not be amplified with universal primers, suggesting potentially novel taxa. One unidentified isolate proliferated only in liquid LME, indicating a unique nutrient requirement. We further screened LME-derived isolates (569 strains) for therapeutic activity using an insect (the silkworm, Bombyx mori) model infected with three pathogenic fungi (Rhizopus arrhizus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans). Distinct extracts showed significant efficacy in each infection model, and the overall hit rate was 6.2%. Notably, the extract of the rare species Ancylobacter sonchi showed marked efficacy against R. arrhizus infection, underscoring LME agar's potential for accessing novel bioresources. These results suggest that LME agar suppresses Bacillus dominance and expands access to diverse, rare, and previously uncultured soil bacteria, providing a powerful platform for microbial library construction and novel drug discovery. KEY POINTS: • LME agar prevents Bacillus dominance, enabling recovery of diverse microbial colonies. • LME agar accesses rarer and more diverse microbiota than nutrient-rich media. • A strain from LME agar showed therapeutic activity in silkworms infected with R. arrhizus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.