ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Information and counselling on post-mortem reproduction: a Delphi study with ART specialists.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo explore what issues should be addressed in terms of information, psychosocial counselling, and future guidelines for individuals considering post-mortem ART/IUI.
methodsA three-round Delphi study was conducted (December 2024 to August 2025) among international ART specialists (embryologists, physicians, nurses, and clinical psychologists). The study was disseminated via the mailing lists of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the Portuguese Society of Reproductive Medicine (SPMR), with the participation of 39 members. In round one, an open-ended question elicited expert perspectives on key issues in information provision, psychosocial counselling, and future guidance for post-mortem ART/IUI. Responses were subjected to qualitative thematic analysis. In round two, participants rated their agreement with each item using a five-point Likert scale. Consensus was reached if ≥ 70% of participants agreed/disagreed with a statement. In round three, prioritisation of items was performed.
resultsThe most important points identified were the need to safeguard legal and procedural aspects, the need to ensure prior written consent from the deceased partner, and the need to integrate psychological counselling throughout the post-mortem ART/IUI process. Areas of divergence were also identified, in relation to bereavement periods, family involvement, and long-term psychosocial support. Emerging themes underrepresented in the literature were also identified, including the psychological impact on healthcare professionals and broader social and cultural considerations.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the need for multidisciplinary, consensus-informed guidance to support clinical practice in post-mortem ART/IUI. In the same way, this study highlights critical gaps in legal clarity, psychological support, and family-centred and child-centred considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.