Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42020799›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2026

Lactate to creatinine ratio: just another biomarker?

Trupti Ingle, Sarah B Kandil

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Trupti IngleYale New Haven Children's Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.
Sarah B KandilYale New Haven Children's Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA. sarah.kandil@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2618-2119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers that meaningfully influence outcomes in pediatric sepsis remain limited. Lactate is commonly used to assess illness severity but is constrained by developmental variability and sensitivity to transient physiologic stress. The lactate-to-creatinine ratio (LCR) has been proposed as a composite biomarker that integrates metabolic derangement with early organ dysfunction to improve risk stratification in critically ill children. Although biologically plausible and readily available, pediatric evidence for LCR is largely restricted to measurements obtained early in the intensive care unit course, raising questions about its clinical relevance in a dynamic disease process. In this commentary, we examine the rationale for LCR as a sepsis biomarker, critique the limitations of single time-point assessment, and consider whether LCR offers actionable information beyond existing clinical evaluation and established biomarkers. We argue that the clinical value of LCR will depend on its ability to inform decision-making and improve patient-centered outcomes, rather than prognostic association alone.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCreatinineLactic AcidSepsisChildCritical IllnessHumansPrognosisBiomarkersCreatinineLactic Acid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.