ArticleLeukemia2026
A targeted circulating tumor DNA landscape of copy number aberrations in large B-cell lymphomas.
Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for mutational genotyping, pretreatment prognostication, and assessment of molecular response is well established in patients with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Here, we have applied targeted panel and duplex sequencing of plasma ctDNA to study copy number aberrations (CNAs) along with mutational landscapes in 123 uniformly treated patients with high-risk LBCL. We find a robust correlation between targeted and whole-genome sequenced CNA landscapes (R = 0.81) and identify CNAs in the ctDNA in 76% of the patients above the limit of detection. We describe the most frequently affected genomic regions, their interactions with diagnostic and genetic subtypes, and associations with overall and progression-free survival. Specifically, we show how ctDNA profiling of TP53 loss outperforms fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based TP53/17p analysis in risk assessment, independent of clinical risk factors and ctDNA concentration. We validate key findings of prognostic tumor fraction and TP53 loss in an independent LBCL cohort. Furthermore, we detect dynamic shifts between the fractions of lymphoma clones by assessing CNAs and mutations in the ctDNA at disease progression. These findings demonstrate the potential of minimally invasive, targeted CNA analysis in resolving the molecular heterogeneity of LBCLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.