ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026
Nucleus of the solitary tract regulation of cue-induced appetitive behaviors via midbrain dopamine neurons.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The hindbrain-hypothalamic noradrenergic pathway controls homeostatic food intake but not cue-induced appetitive behaviors.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internal states including stress and satiety, affect cue-induced feeding behaviors, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. The nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), a key hindbrain hub that integrates interoceptive and viscerosensory signals and projects to reward processing nuclei, is anatomically well-positioned to modulate cue-induced feeding behaviors in response to internal state changes. Using behavioral paradigms combined with chemogenetics and fibre photometry, this study investigated the hypothesis that NTS mediates the effects of stress and satiety on cue-induced feeding behaviors via A2 neurons and modulation of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine signaling. We first showed that both foot shock stress and outcome specific satiety (i.e., sucrose prefeed) reduced cue-induced appetitive behavior. Inhibition of NTS neurons only attenuated the suppressive effect of foot shock stress, but not that of outcome specific satiety, indicating that NTS is required for stress-induced suppression of cue-induced appetitive behavior. Further investigation into the contributing neural phenotype revealed that stimulation of NTS A2 neurons reduced conditioned approach and suppressed cue-evoked VTA dopamine neural activity, without any effects on lateral hypothalamus (LH) neuron activity. Together, these findings suggest that NTS neurons mediate the effects of foot shock stress, but not outcome specific satiety, on cue-induced appetitive behavior, in part through activation of NTS A2 neurons and modulation of cue-evoked VTA dopamine neural activity. These results provide an NTS-mediated mechanism through which stress suppresses cue-induced feeding behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.