Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42020730›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2026

Infection prevention strategies in penile prosthesis implantation: a narrative review.

Pedro Ramos, Simão Abreu, Afonso Morgado, Nuno Tomada

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Surgical considerations in prosthetic urology.International journal of impotence research · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pedro Ramos *Department of Urology, Unidade Local de Saúde São João, Porto, Portugal. pedror1mb@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2172-7439
Simão Abreu *Department of Urology, Unidade Local de Saúde São João, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4891-2108
Afonso MorgadoDepartment of Urology, Unidade Local de Saúde São João, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-4360
Nuno TomadaHospital da Luz Arrábida, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9379-6030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection remains one of the most feared complications of penile prosthesis implantation (PPI), with implications for patient morbidity, psychological burden, and healthcare costs. Although infection rates have declined due to advances in device coatings, surgical techniques and perioperative care, emerging pathogens and antibiotic resistance continue to challenge clinical outcomes. This narrative review explores recent infection-preventing strategies, including antibiotic prophylaxis (APX), across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of PPI. Key themes include comorbidity optimization, urine culture management, and preoperative antiseptic protocols. Intraoperative innovations such as the no-touch technique, targeted irrigation regimens, and antimicrobial-coated implants have shown significant infection reduction. However, evidence for routine postoperative antibiotic use remains inconclusive, and conservative management of infections is limited to select cases. With changing microbial patterns-including increasing fungal and gram-negative organisms-tailored antibiotic approaches and emerging tools like next-generation sequencing may help refine treatment. A multidisciplinary, evidence-based strategy remains essential to further reduce infection rates and optimize patient outcomes in PPI.

Identifiers

PMID42020730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.