ArticleScientific reports2026
Multimodal clinical-imaging deep learning model for predicting refractory hypersplenism after liver transplantation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Refractory hypersplenism after liver transplantation (LT), defined in this study as persistent cytopenia and splenomegaly beyond 6 months after LT, is a clinically important postoperative condition. However, reliable methods for preoperative risk stratification remain limited. This study aimed to identify preoperative risk factors and to develop a multimodal deep learning model integrating clinical and CT-derived imaging features for predicting refractory hypersplenism after LT. Patients who underwent LT between 2013 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed and classified into remission (n = 120) and refractory (n = 44) hypersplenism groups. Clinical, laboratory, and CT-derived splenic parameters were compared. Radiomic features were extracted from preoperative contrast-enhanced CT images. Logistic regression identified independent predictors, and single-modality (clinical or CT) and multimodal (clinical–radiomic) deep learning models were developed. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, F1-score, and accuracy across training, validation, and test cohorts. Preoperative platelet count (OR = 1.04, p = 0.006), splenic length (OR = 0.96, p < 0.001), and splenic vein diameter (OR = 0.81, p = 0.001) were independent predictors. The multimodal model showed the best overall performance (AUC = 0.857, F1 = 0.842), outperforming logistic regression (P = 0.022). Attention maps highlighted the spleen and splenic hilum were among the most influential regions for prediction. Preoperative splenic morphology and imaging features related to splenic hemodynamic burden were associated with refractory hypersplenism after LT. The proposed clinical–radiomic multimodal deep learning model showed promising predictive performance and may provide useful supplementary information for preoperative risk stratification. Further validation in larger multicenter cohorts is needed before broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.