Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42020697›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhancing automatic landmark localization in X-ray images using combined segmentation and regression models: application to lower limb alignment assessment.

Ashkan Zarghami, Sebastián Amador Sánchez, Philippe Van Overschelde, Jef Vandemeulebroucke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashkan Zarghami *Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Sebastián Amador Sánchez *Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium. sebastian.amador.sanchez@vub.be.
Philippe Van OverscheldeMoveUP, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Jef VandemeulebrouckeDepartment of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manual landmark detection in lower limb medical imaging is time-consuming and error-prone. Recently, authors have proposed automatic landmark detection methods based on image segmentation, coordinate regression, or a combination of both to aid clinicians. While the latter approach shows promising results, detailed optimization of its design choices, including the integration strategy and hyperparameter tuning, remains unexplored. This study investigates the optimal approach to combining image segmentation and coordinate regression, focusing on selecting suitable network architectures and optimizing their configurations. We contrasted two methods for training the network: end-to-end training and cascading the subnetworks, and assessed the optimal architecture for each strategy. For landmark segmentation, we compared U-Net and Swin-UNETR models, and for coordinate regression, we assessed VGG-16, ResNet-50, and Swin-B. Performance was evaluated in detecting eight landmarks in each leg of a complete lower-limb X-ray and in examining their influence on the clinical task of measuring lower-limb malalignment. Swin-UNETR slightly outperformed U-Net, with a lower Euclidean distance error (1.74 mm [0.98 mm] versus 1.75 mm [1.06 mm]) and significantly fewer false positives (160 vs. 502). For coordinate regression, VGG-16 in the end-to-end configuration achieved the highest accuracy (2.44 mm [2.12 mm]) and proved optimal for lower limb alignment assessment, with 97.88% of estimations falling within [Formula: see text] of the hip-knee-ankle angle ground truth. Combining Swin-UNETR with VGG-16 within an end-to-end framework yields the most accurate and robust performance for automated lower-limb landmark detection and alignment assessment.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLower ExtremityRadiographyAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksDetection AlgorithmsHumansRegression AnalysisCoordinate regressionLandmark detectionLocalizationLower limb alignmentSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID42020697
PMCPMC13269786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.