Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42020679›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Task-relevant haptic feedback improves asymptotic performance in de novo arm control acquisition.

Ian S Howard, Laura Alvarez-Hidalgo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ian S HowardSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. ian.howard@plymouth.ac.uk.
Laura Alvarez-HidalgoSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council DTC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human motor system can learn to control novel effectors, but the contribution of task-relevant haptic dynamics to de novo learning remains unclear. Using a bimanual robotic interface, participants learned over two days to control the shoulder and elbow angles of a virtual arm in order to achieve accurate endpoint movements via constrained handle motions. On Day 1, one group practiced a purely kinematic mapping, whereas another group received continuous haptic feedback generated by an endpoint mass. With practice, movements shifted from sequential to more coordinated control and trajectories became straighter, with reduced directional deviation during target-directed endpoint movements, particularly in the haptic-feedback group. On Day 2, both groups learned to compensate for a velocity-dependent force field. Trajectories were initially curved but straightened with practice, and washout produced after-effects. Training in the presence of task-relevant haptic dynamics was associated with more complete error reduction during force-field exposure, while maintaining robust after-effects. Exponential modeling provided no evidence for a difference in learning rate between groups but was consistent with a lower residual (asymptotic) error in the haptic-feedback condition. These benefits therefore reflected a difference in final predictive compensation rather than in the speed of adaptation. Together, these results suggest that performance in the presence of task-relevant haptic dynamics was associated with more complete predictive compensation when adapting to novel dynamics, without evidence of faster adaptation.

Indexed as

2D planar armBimanualde novoDynamic learningMotor learningNovel kinematics

Identifiers

PMID42020679
PMCPMC13272900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.