SynthesisScientific reports2026
The impact of microplastics on the mice gut microbiome: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microplastic-Bacteria Interactions: Toxicity, Colonisation, Degradation and Prospects.Environmental microbiology · 2026Review
- Polystyrene microplastic stress induces adaptive responses and functional remodeling of gastrointestinal microbiota in fattening lambs.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Pathogenesis of Micro/Nanoplastics in Mammalian Systems: Gut to Systemic Multi-Organ Dysfunction.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastics are nearly ubiquitous in the natural environment. There is increasing awareness of the ingestion of microplastics in a wide range of wild animals and humans, but their health and fitness impacts remain poorly understood. Mounting evidence suggests that microplastics could accumulate in the gut, affecting the microbiome and hindering its function. This may constitute a direct pathway through which exposure to microplastics could affect health and disease. However, prior studies on the effects of microplastic exposure on the microbiome show contrasting findings raising the question whether microplastics truly affect the microbiome. Here, we performed the first meta-analysis on the effects of dietary microplastic exposure on the gut microbiome of mice. Overall, we found support for a significant impact of microplastic exposure on the relative abundance of gut bacteria. Microplastic exposure significantly increased the relative abundance of phyla Bacillota and Pseudomonadota. More in depth order-level analysis revealed significant increases in relative abundance within Bacillota of orders Lachnospirales and Lactobacillales and within Pseudomonadota of orders Burkholderiales, Hyphomicrobiales and Moraxellales. In the gut microbiome, Bacillota is associated with carbohydrate metabolism and Pseudomonadota is associated with facultative anaerobes, thus these changes may have functional consequences. Our findings highlight the importance of distinguishing among differing bacterial taxa when assessing the impacts of microplastics on the gut microbiome as the direction and size of the impact varies by phyla.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.