ArticleScientific reports2026
Expert experience-guided virtual datasets for adaptive automatic driving in metro trains.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptive automatic driving (AAD) for metro trains is currently hindered by the limited diversity of real-world operational data and the high costs associated with its acquisition. To address these challenges, this study proposes a comprehensive four-stage framework that integrates expert operational knowledge, thereby facilitating scalable AAD deployment with minimal dependency on empirical datasets. The methodology initially leverages expert-defined motion constraints, such as acceleration profiles and speed thresholds, to synthesize 2.9 million high-fidelity driving curves that capture complex speed-distance dynamics across diverse track conditions. These trajectories are then processed through a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making system informed by domain expertise to select optimal curves that balance energy efficiency, passenger comfort, and stopping precision. Subsequently, the selected curves are transformed into structured parametric representations to train a random forest model for precise trajectory recovery and reconstruction. Empirical validation across various operational scenarios (with typical travel durations of 170-238 s) demonstrates that the framework achieves a 12% reduction in energy consumption and 95% passenger satisfaction, while aligning with stopping and arrival time targets of [Formula: see text] m and [Formula: see text] s, respectively. Furthermore, the model yields a 98.2% reconstruction accuracy with a 76% reduction in data costs compared to traditional sampling methods. By effectively bridging the gap between expert experience and data-driven learning, this framework addresses real-world adaptability gaps, enabling robust AAD deployment in low-infrastructure environments while remaining fully compatible with existing automatic train operation (ATO) systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.