ArticleScientific reports2026
Unveiling spring behaviour through copula-based inter-spring connectivity in the Central Himalaya.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the performance of elliptical and D-vine copula models for predicting discharge at one spring (S5) using observed discharge data from the other four springs (S1-S4) and concurrent rainfall within a single springshed of Central Himalaya, India, in the context that the geological typology of the study springs is similar. The hypothesis that simpler, symmetric dependence models may outperform highly flexible vine structures when hydrological connectivity is strong, and data length is limited, is tested. The results revealed that elliptical copulas substantially outperformed D-vine structures, with the best elliptical model achieving RMSE ≈ 0.11 lpm and R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.