Trial reportScientific reports2026
Early differential protein expression in blood and bronchoalveolar fluid among ARDS phenotypes.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01667146 (A Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of an Open Lung Strategy Including Permissive Hypercapnia, Alveolar Recruitment and Low Airway Pressure in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of an Open Lung Strategy Including Permissive Hypercapnia, Alveolar Recruitment and Low Airway Pressure in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Subphenotype-specific serum proteomic signatures in patients with ARDS.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein pathways underlying ARDS phenotypes are not fully elucidated. The aim of this subanalysis of an international randomized controlled clinical trial, which assessed the potential benefit of a maximal lung recruitment strategy, was to identify protein signatures in serum and bronchoalveolar fluid associated with ARDS phenotypes and to improve understanding of the underlying biological pathways. Whole proteomic profiling of serum and bronchoalveolar fluid was performed in 50 and 21 ARDS patients, respectively, and compared with 24 non-ARDS controls. ARDS patients were classified as hyperinflammatory (Hyper; n = 17) or hypoinflammatory (Hypo; n = 33) according to a previously validated three-variable classifier model. Sampling for proteomic analysis was performed at study inclusion, before any study intervention. Protein signatures differentiating hyper- and hypoinflammatory ARDS from controls consisted of 19 proteins in serum and 17 proteins in bronchoalveolar fluid. Proteins that are part of the acute phase response signaling pathway and the complement cascade were more highly expressed in Hypo than in Hyper. Canonical pathway analysis showed that inflammatory pathways, including the complement cascade, acute phase response, and cachexia signaling, were activated to a greater extent in Hypo than in Hyper. For some key molecules, canonical pathways and upstream regulators demonstrated different directions of activation between serum and bronchoalveolar fluid. Distinct ARDS phenotypes are associated with different early proteomic patterns in both serum and bronchoalveolar fluid. Inflammatory pathways and upstream regulators were more pronounced in the hypoinflammatory ARDS phenotype. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01667146
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.