ArticleScientific reports2026
On the prediction models for brain signal-based emotion recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper analyzes the factors contributing to the performance gap between subject-dependent and subject-independent EEG-based emotion recognition systems. With this key objective, the experiments are conducted in this work using two benchmark datasets; DEAP and SEED across classical machine learning algorithms, KNN, Random Forest, Linear Discriminant Analysis and a deep learning model like CNN and EEGNet. In cross-subject evaluations, CNN achieved the highest accuracy of 84% on the SEED dataset. To interpret these outcomes, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values are employed to identify the most influential EEG features and frequency bands. This analysis not only highlights the key contributors to model decisions but also exposes feature-level inconsistencies that explain the reduced performance in subject-independent scenarios. This diagnostic study provides valuable insights into the limitations of current approaches and highlights the importance of explainability for developing robust EEG-based emotion recognition systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.