ReviewJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026
Improving mercury exposure estimates: a meta-analysis of methylmercury-to-total mercury ratios in Canadian traditional foods.
Review in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethylmercury (MeHg) exposure poses health risks to Indigenous Peoples in Canada, who often rely on fish and wildlife as part of their traditional diet. Risk assessments tend to be overly conservative because most available data report total mercury (tHg) rather than MeHg, leading to uncertainty and potential overestimation of exposure, particularly for foods in which the proportion of tHg present as MeHg is lower or highly variable.
objectiveTo conduct a meta-analysis of MeHg and tHg levels in traditional foods, develop a comprehensive database, and generate empirically derived conversion factors to improve the estimation of dietary MeHg exposure.
methodsWe critically reviewed paired MeHg and tHg data from 31 published studies and two unpublished datasets. Species- and tissue-specific MeHg:tHg ratios were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis, and conservative conversion factors were derived from upper confidence limits with sensitivity analyses. Conversion factors were evaluated using dietary exposure data from the Inuit Health Survey and the First Nations Food, Nutrition, and Environment Study. Variability in ratios was explored using meta-regression and within-species analyses.
resultsMeHg:tHg ratios were quantified for 65 species-tissue combinations, revealing strong and systematic tissue- and species-specific patterns. Conversion factors were derived for 38 species-tissue combinations, with most values below 100%, particularly for liver and other internal organs, indicating that assuming tHg equals MeHg frequently overestimates dietary MeHg exposure. Application of these factors substantially reduced overestimation of MeHg intake in most regions, while providing limited benefit in regions dominated by low-concentration foods. Exploratory analyses indicated variability by tissue, species, and location, with limited evidence of additional effects of age or size. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides a systematic database and validated conversion factors for MeHg in traditional foods, improving dietary risk assessment while underscoring the need for continued species and site-specific monitoring. IMPACT STATEMENT: This study advances mercury exposure science by providing empirically derived conversion factors to estimate methylmercury (MeHg) in traditional foods when only total mercury is measured. By reducing overestimation of MeHg exposure while retaining a precautionary framework, the findings support more accurate dietary risk assessment, improve hazard characterization, and inform culturally relevant food safety guidance for Indigenous Peoples. The results also highlight biological and environmental drivers of variability that can guide future monitoring and exposure assessment efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42020534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.