ArticleScientific reports2026
Lightweight large language models for early sepsis prediction via a semantic abstraction rule engine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis remains a major global health challenge due to its high mortality rate and the difficulty of predicting its onset from nonspecific early symptoms. To address this, we explored the feasibility of using fine-tuned small-scale large language models (LLMs) to perform accurate sepsis prediction from structured clinical time-series data. We developed a Semantic Abstraction Rule Engine (SARE) that transforms numerical clinical data into clinician-readable textual descriptions through temporal feature extraction and semantic transformation. Using these representations, four lightweight LLMs were fine-tuned with Low-Rank Adaptation and evaluated on publicly available datasets. The fine-tuned models consistently outperformed traditional machine learning and temporal prediction methods, with notable improvements in sensitivity and area under the curve. The Gemma-2-9B model achieved an AUC of 0.9307 and a sensitivity of 0.8532 on the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019 dataset, surpassing existing state-of-the-art approaches. These findings demonstrate that lightweight LLMs can provide accurate and computationally efficient predictions, offering practical support for early sepsis detection in resource-limited healthcare environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.