ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive client participation mechanism for federated learning in heterogeneous vehicular networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In vehicular networks, federated learning faces significant challenges due to resource heterogeneity, dynamic participation patterns, and intermittent connectivity among vehicles. Traditional client selection mechanisms often fail to consider the two-tier decision-making process inherent in vehicular network environments, where both central servers and individual vehicles must make participation decisions based on their respective constraints. Moreover, existing model aggregation algorithms typically assume fixed client participation and cannot adapt to the highly variable participation patterns unique to vehicular networks. This paper proposes a comprehensive vehicular federated learning framework with three key innovations. First, we introduce a strategy-driven adaptive client participation mechanism with a two-tier decision-making process that combines server-side reinforcement learning-based client selection with client-side autonomous participation decisions based on local resource thresholds. Second, we develop an incremental online policy learning algorithm based on Proximal Policy Optimization (IO-PPO) to address the data scarcity challenge in federated learning environments by enabling continuous learning from limited trajectory data. Third, we propose a dynamic client size-adaptive optimized model aggregation algorithm that adapts to different participation patterns while considering both current and historical client contributions. Our approach leverages a synergistic combination of reinforcement learning for adaptive decision-making, asynchronous federated learning principles for flexible participation, and graph-based modeling for capturing network topology effects. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that compared to existing methods, the proposed framework significantly improves learning efficiency, convergence stability, and model performance in realistic vehicular network scenarios.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.