Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42020479›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Multi-target machine learning for predicting mechanical properties of FDM-printed polymer components.

A Lakshumu Naidu, Lakshmana Rao Kalabarige, D Sandhya Saraswathi, Abhijit Bhattacharya, Pankaj Kumar, Pawan Kumar Singotia, Shyam Sunder Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A Lakshumu NaiduDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, GMRIT Deemed to be University, Rajam, Andhra Pradesh, 532127, India.
Lakshmana Rao KalabarigeDepartment of Computer Science Engineering, GMRIT Deemed to be University, Rajam, Andhra Pradesh, 532127, India.
D Sandhya SaraswathiDepartment of Mathematics, Aditya University, Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh, 533437, India.
Abhijit BhattacharyaDepartment of Computational Sciences, Brainware University, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700125, India.
Pankaj KumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, GMRIT Deemed to be University, Rajam, Andhra Pradesh, 532127, India.
Pawan Kumar SingotiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Raghu Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 531162, India.
Shyam Sunder SharmaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303007, India. shyamsunder.sharma@jaipur.manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing using Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) is increasingly adopted for producing polymer components; however, achieving consistent and repeatable mechanical performance remains a challenge due to process-induced variability and material behavior. Existing studies have predominantly focused on predicting individual mechanical properties using single-output machine learning (ML) models, which limits their ability to capture interdependencies among multiple responses. The present study addresses this gap by investigating whether a Multi-Target Machine Learning (MTML) framework can effectively predict multiple mechanical properties of FDM-fabricated polymer components simultaneously. Experimental datasets were generated from tensile, hardness, and impact tests conducted on specimens fabricated using Polylactic Acid (PLA), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), and Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol-modified (PETG) materials. Several regression-based ML models, including K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Extra Trees (ET), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (EGB), were implemented within both single-target and multi-target learning paradigms. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated using standard statistical metrics, including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and R2-score. The results demonstrate strong agreement between predicted and experimental values, with R2 values ranging from 0.74 to 0.998, indicating the effectiveness of the MTML framework in capturing complex, non-linear relationships among mechanical responses. The study confirms that the proposed MTML approach improves predictive reliability and modeling efficiency compared to conventional single-output strategies. The findings contribute to advancing data-driven predictive modeling in FDM-based additive manufacturing and provide a robust foundation for future applications in process optimization, quality assessment, and intelligent manufacturing systems. The results demonstrate strong predictive capability, with R2 values ranging from approximately 0.74 to 0.998, depending on the material, mechanical property, and regression model. Among the evaluated algorithms, Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR) consistently achieved the highest accuracy for ductility-related properties such as reduction in area and elongation, while Extra Trees Regression (ETR) and GBR showed robust performance for strength-related properties across multiple materials. Overall, the study confirms that the proposed MTML framework improves prediction reliability and modelling efficiency compared to conventional single-output approaches. The findings provide a data-driven foundation for mechanical property estimation in FDM and highlight GBR as the most efficient and reliable regression algorithm within the investigated experimental scope.

Indexed as

AdditiveExperimentsIntelligenceManufacturingOptimizationPolymersPredictionRegression

Identifiers

PMID42020479
PMCPMC13270057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.