ArticleScientific reports2026
The dynamic urban river water quality prediction based on hybrid model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The choice of prediction model plays a decisive role in prediction performance, and hybrid models contribute to enhancing both model performance and prediction accuracy. This study aims to improve the predictive performance of models in time series data processing and further explore urban river water quality prediction models. The hybrid ARIMA-LSTM model was proposed the to simulate and predict water quality indicators in urban rivers of Zhongshan City. The hybrid model firstly used the linear prediction capability of the ARIMA model to extract linear components from water quality data, thereby generating residuals as inputs for subsequent steps. Then the nonlinear prediction of the LSTM model used the results from the previous step as the input to obtain nonlinear data. Finally, the prediction results of the ARIMA model and the LSTM network were integrated to obtain fitting evaluation results, thereby improving the accuracy of prediction outcomes. Furthermore, three traditional individual prediction methods (CNN, LSTM, ARIMA) along with hybrid ARIMA-LSTM model were conducted and compared to evaluate the performance of the hybrid model. The results showed that the hybrid prediction model was superior to individual prediction methods in terms of accuracy. By integrating LSTM's ability to capture complex nonlinear temporal features with ARIMA's proficiency in modeling linear trends and seasonal components, the hybrid model exhibited superior comprehensive performance in characterizing dynamic water quality variation patterns. The study proved that using the hybrid model could effectively improve the accuracy of short-term urban water quality prediction, and that the prediction accuracy of different pollutants varied under the same prediction method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.