Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Fernando T MaestreEnvironmental Science and Engineering, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-4856
Nan LuState Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. nanlv@rcees.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1139-2033
Guang ZhaoLhasa Plateau Ecosystem Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2048-6461
Yangjian ZhangLhasa Plateau Ecosystem Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6758-2453
Weiliang ChenState Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
David J EldridgeCentre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-486X
Juan J GaitánInstituto de Ciencias Agrarias (ICA), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel García-GómezDepartamento de Ingeniería y Morfología del Terreno, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3148-1495
Beatriz GozaloInstituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio Ramón Margalef, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Nicolas GrossUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, Unité Mixte de Recherche Ecosystème Prairial, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9730-3240
Emilio GuiradoEnvironmental Science and Engineering, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5348-7391
Jaime Martínez-ValderramaInstituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio Ramón Margalef, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-5674
Hugo SaizDepartamento de Ciencias Agrarias y Medio Natural, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ciencias Ambientales de Aragón (IUCA), Universidad de Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-2996
Andrés Tangarife-EscobarDepartment of Biogeochemical Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
Enrique ValenciaDepartamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3359-0759
Cong WangState Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-5319
Kai WangDepartment of Biogeochemical Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
Bojie FuState Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9920-9802
Jianbei HuangDepartment of Biogeochemical Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany. hjianbei@bgc-jena.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5286-5645
Funding
CAS | Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (RCEES, CAS) HZXM20225001Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Max Planck Society) M.FE.A.EBIO0002
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Reliable predictions of dryland carbon fluxes require understanding the persistence and turnover of soil organic carbon (SOC). We measure radiocarbon to quantify the age of SOC and CO
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Persistence and turnover of soil organic carbon in global drylands. · full record | OpenQuestion