ArticleNature communications2026
Autonomous driving system based on dual process theory and deliberate practice theory.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autonomous driving system based on dual process theory and deliberate practice theory.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autonomous driving, despite significant progress, is still not widely applied in open, unconstrained environments, primarily owing to deficiencies in hazard perception, few-shot generalization, corner case generalization, and evaluation metrics, resulting in reliability concerns. To address these challenges, we propose CogniDrive, a framework based on dual-process and deliberate practice theories, leveraging contextual reasoning of the Large Language Model (LLM) to enhance driving systems robustness and generalization. Inspired by dual-process theory, CogniDrive comprises two cognition modes: InstinctNav for rapid, intuitive decision-making and ReflectPlan for reflective reasoning. Enhanced by a thought model and experience embedding for LLM, InstinctNav combines behavioral cloning and retrieval augmented generation to enhance few-shot learning efficiency based on deliberate practice theory. ReflectPlan processes and internalizes reward signals embedded in language tokens within the prompt, derived from a self-reflection mechanism, to enable continuous improvement and generalization. To detect hazards in corner cases precluded by limited training data distribution, a vision language model is integrated for comprehensive environmental understanding through multimodal self-reflection. We further propose an evaluation framework that complements traditional metrics by emphasizing safety, comfort, and energy efficiency, and demonstrate state-of-the-art performance through extensive open-loop and closed-loop experiments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.