Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42020376›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Autonomous driving system based on dual process theory and deliberate practice theory.

Xiao Zhang, Tianyu Hu, Juntao Lyu, Qiankun Liu, Qianchuan Zhao, Mingyi Li, Kang Li, Songde Han, Jiansheng Chen, Huimin Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiao ZhangSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2804-6915
Tianyu HuSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China. tianyu@ustb.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9903-0696
Juntao LyuSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3374-047X
Qiankun LiuSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Qianchuan ZhaoDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-5621
Mingyi LiSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Kang LiSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Songde HanSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Jiansheng ChenSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2040-7938
Huimin MaSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China. mhmpub@ustb.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5383-5667

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) U25B20273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autonomous driving, despite significant progress, is still not widely applied in open, unconstrained environments, primarily owing to deficiencies in hazard perception, few-shot generalization, corner case generalization, and evaluation metrics, resulting in reliability concerns. To address these challenges, we propose CogniDrive, a framework based on dual-process and deliberate practice theories, leveraging contextual reasoning of the Large Language Model (LLM) to enhance driving systems robustness and generalization. Inspired by dual-process theory, CogniDrive comprises two cognition modes: InstinctNav for rapid, intuitive decision-making and ReflectPlan for reflective reasoning. Enhanced by a thought model and experience embedding for LLM, InstinctNav combines behavioral cloning and retrieval augmented generation to enhance few-shot learning efficiency based on deliberate practice theory. ReflectPlan processes and internalizes reward signals embedded in language tokens within the prompt, derived from a self-reflection mechanism, to enable continuous improvement and generalization. To detect hazards in corner cases precluded by limited training data distribution, a vision language model is integrated for comprehensive environmental understanding through multimodal self-reflection. We further propose an evaluation framework that complements traditional metrics by emphasizing safety, comfort, and energy efficiency, and demonstrate state-of-the-art performance through extensive open-loop and closed-loop experiments.

Identifiers

PMID42020376
PMCPMC13315255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.