ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2026
Calorimetric differential pressure sensor with high sensitivity for hydrodynamic perception.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate perception of hydrodynamic information is crucial for intelligent navigation and control of underwater robotics in challenging underwater environments. Current diaphragm-based differential pressure sensors are generally constrained by limited resolution for hydrodynamic perception. Here, we present a high-sensitivity calorimetric differential pressure sensor featured with precisely designed calorimetric components located on cantilever beams. The proposed sensor achieves an impressive underwater differential pressure resolution of 18.9 mPa and a repeatability standard deviation of 0.38%. By integrating a sensor array consisting of three such sensors into an underwater robotic model, the velocity and yaw angle were estimated simultaneously with average solution errors of 2.9 mm·s
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.