Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42020133›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2026

Midodrine for Sepsis Treatment and Early Vasopressor Weaning (MID-STEP): protocol for a pragmatic randomised clinical trial.

Aysun Tekin, Gabriele Halpern, Diksha Gowda, Vikas Bansal, Amy Schuchard, Anes Joguncic, Phillip Schulte, Yewande E Odeyemi, Sumera Ahmad, Bo Madsen and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06319248 (MID-STEP), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06319248 phase2recruitingnot on this map

MID-STEP (MIDodrine for Sepsis Treatment and Early vasoPressor Weaning) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2024 to 2029Enrolled308ConditionsSepsis, Low Blood PressureArmsMidodrine, Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Aysun TekinDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1891-2118
Gabriele HalpernDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Diksha GowdaDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Vikas BansalDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Amy SchuchardPulmonary and Critical Care Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Anes JoguncicDepartment of Epidemiology, Public Health Institute of Canton of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Phillip SchulteDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Yewande E OdeyemiDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4446-198X
Sumera AhmadDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Bo MadsenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Zeeshan RizwanDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Erin F BarretoDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Swetha ReddyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Vatsa BhavsarDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Devang SanghaviDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Juan Pablo Domecq GarcesDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Syed Anjum KhanDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System in Mankato, Mankato, Minnesota, USA.
Aryan ShiariDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA.
Rodrigo Cartin-CebaDivision of Pulmonary, Department of Medicine and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Ognjen GajicDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Amos LalDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA Lal.Amos@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0021-2033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSepsis is a global health priority with nearly 50 million cases annually. Cardiovascular dysfunction is common, frequently manifesting as hypotension that persists despite fluid resuscitation. Most affected patients require the use of intravenous (IV) vasoactive agents, typically necessitating intensive care unit (ICU)-level monitoring, invasive interventions and contributing substantially to healthcare costs. Midodrine, an oral alpha-1 agonist approved for orthostatic hypotension, has increasingly been used off-label as a vasopressor-sparing (reducing IV vasopressor use) strategy in sepsis, despite limited and inconsistent evidence. This pragmatic, randomised, open-label trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of midodrine in patients with sepsis-associated hypotension. We hypothesise that, compared with standard care, midodrine administration will reduce the duration of IV vasopressor use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 308 adult patients with sepsis-associated hypotension will be enrolled (154 per arm). The intervention group will, in addition to standard of care, receive enteral midodrine 10 mg three times daily. Outcomes will be ascertained pragmatically via electronic health record-based data retrieval and adjudicated by research coordinators blinded to treatment assignment. The primary outcome is time alive and off IV vasopressors in the first 28 days (in hours) after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include cumulative vasopressor exposure; use and duration of central venous access; cumulative fluid balance over the first 48 hours and up to 7 days of ICU stay; ICU and hospital length of stay; and ICU-, hospital-, and organ support-free days through day 28. Safety outcomes include adverse events potentially attributable to midodrine during hospitalisation including acute kidney injury. Primary analyses will follow an intention-to-treat framework, including all randomised participants according to their assigned treatment groups. Primary and secondary outcomes will be compared using a van Elteren test stratified by randomisation factors. A predefined secondary Bayesian analysis of the primary outcome will provide complementary estimates of treatment effect. Safety outcomes will be summarised descriptively without formal between-arm hypothesis testing. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approved this protocol and required written informed consent from all participants (IRB# 24-0 00 121). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and international conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06319248.

Indexed as

HypotensionMidodrineSepsisVasoconstrictor AgentsAdultHumansIntensive Care UnitsResearch DesignMidodrineVasoconstrictor AgentsPragmatic Clinical TrialSepsisSeptic ShockVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID42020133
PMCPMC13110638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.