ArticleBMJ open2026
Rehabilitation intervention to improve Recovery after an Episode of Delirium in adults over 65 years (RecoverED): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study in NHS acute hospitals in the UK.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo test a theory-informed, person-centred rehabilitation intervention for older adults following a hospital admission complicated by delirium, developed in line with the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions, to determine whether: (a) the intervention is acceptable to individuals with delirium and (b) a definitive trial and parallel economic evaluation of the intervention are feasible.
designMulticentre, single-arm feasibility study.
participants19 patient (aged >65 years old) and carer pairs were recruited from six National Health Service acute hospitals across the UK.
interventionHome-based rehabilitation programme designed to support recovery after hospital discharge, addressing cognitive, physical, physiological and psychosocial needs. Delivered by a trained team of occupational therapists, physiotherapists and rehabilitation support workers, the intervention included a comprehensive home assessment, collaborative goal setting, up to 10 personalised sessions over 12 weeks and the use of a recovery record to guide progress, education and psychosocial support. OUTCOME MEASURES: Examined aspects of feasibility including eligibility, recruitment, data collection, attrition, acceptability of the rehabilitation intervention and potential to calculate cost-effectiveness.
resultsIn total, 419 patients were identified as having delirium and 36 met the full eligibility. 19 patient and carer pairs agreed to participate in the study (consent rate 53%; 95% CI 35% to 70%) with 13 participants going on to start the intervention (68%; 95% CI 43% to 87%) and 10 participants completing final follow-up (53%; 95% CI 29% to 76%). Baseline assessments were conducted either during hospitalisation or postdischarge, with initial assessments occurring a mean of 18 days (SD=13.0) postdischarge, and 77% completed within 14 days. Participants completed a mean of eight sessions (SD=2.9). 19 participants completed the primary outcome at baseline, while 10 participants completed it at 6-month follow-up. The economic evaluation indicated a total cost of £1249.29 per participant, covering assessments, intervention sessions and training costs.
conclusionsThe intervention showed feasibility among older adults recovering from delirium, as evidenced by the trial processes for participants who entered the study. However, recruitment challenges indicate a need for better strategies and further research through a definitive randomised controlled trial to demonstrate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15676570.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.