Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42020121›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

EMPOWHPVR: exploring the factors that impact HPV self-sampling uptake amongst Black women and people with a cervix in Peel region, Ontario - a qualitative study protocol.

Nakia K Lee-Foon, Aisha Lofters, Keddone Dias, Gina S Ogilvie, Notisha Massaquoi, Kerry Kuluski, Robert J Reid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nakia K Lee-FoonInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada nakia.lee-foon@thp.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2500-6244
Aisha LoftersWomen's College Hospital, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7322-0894
Keddone DiasLAMP Community Health Centre, LAMP Community Health Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gina S OgilvieBritish Columbia Center for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5783-4493
Notisha MassaquoiDepartment of Health and Society, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kerry KuluskiInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Robert J ReidInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvery 2 minutes, a woman dies from cervical cancer, resulting in over 300 000 preventable deaths globally. Nearly all cervical cancers are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) and are preventable with HPV vaccination and screening through Papanicolaou (Pap) and HPV tests. In Canada, cervical cancer mortality rates have declined in recent decades with more accessible cervical cancer screening programmes. However, screening rates remain low, particularly among Black women and people with a cervix (WPC).Cervical cancer screening studies of Black WPC in Ontario-Canada's most populous province-are limited. These studies indicate Black WPCs are at elevated risk for under-screening, with many overdue for screening.An innovative approach to begin addressing delays is HPV self-sampling (HPVSS). Self-sampling is a cost-effective and more accurate test for detecting high-risk HPV infections associated with precancerous changes versus the Pap test. Self-sampling supports Canada's action plan-a response to WHO's global strategy-to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040.Despite Canada's plan, research on the state of Black WPCs' HPV knowledge and self-sampling interventions tailored to them is scant. These scarcities are concerning as Ontario plans to implement HPV primary screening and offer HPVSS soon.The study objective is to codevelop an HPVSS intervention tailored for and made by Black WPC in Peel region, Ontario. This protocol focuses on phase one of a two-phased study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In phase one, a qualitative, community-informed approach, co-led by community research assistants, will be used to purposively recruit 10 service providers (eg, clinicians, social workers, community care workers) and 40 Black WPC who will undergo one-on-one semistructured interviews and sociodemographic surveys to explore the state of: (1) Black WPC's level of HPV, cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening knowledge; (2) Black WPC's motivators, beliefs, attitudes and misconceptions towards HPVSS; (3) Black WPC's perceived barriers and facilitators to HPVSS and (4) service providers' perspectives on Black WPC's barriers and facilitators to HPVSS. Charmaz's grounded theory approach and intersectionality will guide data collection and analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Trillium Health Partners Research Ethics Board (ID#1207). Study findings will be disseminated through community healthcare events, conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications and virtual and physical pamphlets. Additionally, summaries of the findings will be shared and tailored to collaborators, healthcare leadership and researchers and community health centres. Wide dissemination will help enhance understanding of the state of cervical cancer screening, HPV and HPVSS among Black WPC. Given Canada's commitment to eliminating cervical cancer, study findings will be used to begin developing an HPVSS intervention for Black communities.

Indexed as

Black PeopleEarly Detection of CancerPapillomavirus InfectionsSelf-TestingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultCervix UteriFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMass ScreeningOntarioPapanicolaou TestQualitative ResearchSpecimen HandlingHealth EquityHPV InfectionMass ScreeningPrimary PreventionPUBLIC HEALTHSexually Transmitted Disease

Identifiers

PMID42020121
PMCPMC13110521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.