ArticleContemporary clinical trials2026
Enhanced recruitment methods for a dietary intervention trial aimed at reducing risk of colorectal cancer.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study developed and evaluated strategies to optimize recruitment and retention to a mobile health-supported dietary intervention trial, the MyBestGI Study. This included instituting a Personal Technology Assistant and enhancing the study website with three short videos. The Personal Technology Assistant was available to address potential digital literacy barriers. The videos provided information about the study, introduced the research staff, and provided directions to the study location. Each of the videos also addressed concerns related to privacy, security and ethics that can curtail trust in research. Evaluation of these strategies was done utilizing semi-structured interviews. Study participants reported joining the study to improve their own health and/or to help others who are at risk for colorectal cancer. Technological assistance was not requested for use of the MyBestGI app, but it was useful for completing the online dietary recalls that were required for study eligibility. Themes identified from the interviews included that participants appreciated knowing that technological support would be available if needed and that it was helpful in completing the dietary recalls. Themes identified regarding the utility of the videos included that the videos increased participant comfort with study procedures and the staff, and that the videos did influence their decision to join the study. Although the strategies implemented facilitated the enrollment process to the study, they unfortunately did not enhance the diversity of the MyBestGI study population. Despite this, the benefits uncovered from the staff and participant interviews do support the implementation of these strategies for recruitment enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.