ArticleZeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie2026
Evaluation of Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Germany: Opportunities for Expanding the Donor Pool.
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) represents an important alternative to deceased donor transplantation, particularly in times of organ shortage. This study analyzes the selection process of living liver donors at a German transplant center that performs both living and deceased donor liver transplantations. Methods: In a retrospective analysis, potential living liver donors were evaluated. Medical data and reasons for donor exclusion were collected, and recipient cohorts were categorized according to transplantation indication and urgency. Donor outcomes were also assessed. Results: Between January 2013 and December 2023, a total of 594 potential living donors were evaluated at Jena University Hospital. Of these, 124 successfully proceeded to donation. During the outpatient evaluation phase, 357 donors were excluded. Subsequently, 237 individuals underwent inpatient assessments, of whom an additional 100 were excluded. The main reasons for donor exclusion were medical or psychological contraindications (n = 160), as well as donor-independent factors such as disease progression in the recipient (n = 90) or withdrawal of consent by either the recipient or the donor (n = 54). Particularly among recipients with malignant diseases who had little or no chance of receiving a deceased donor organ, a high willingness to donate was observed-even among distant relatives or unrelated donors. Conclusion: A standardized evaluation protocol improves the efficiency of living donor liver transplantation within the Eurotransplant region and ensures donor safety. Diverse contraindications necessitate targeted exclusion diagnostics for individual potential donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.