ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Evaluating the Impact of Short-Notice Accreditation Assessment on Hospitals' Patient Safety and Quality Culture: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accreditation programs are used by hospitals and health services to be independently reviewed against established safety and quality standards and have been a feature of global health systems for over a century. While evidence that accreditation programs directly improve patient safety and quality outcomes exists, the findings of various researchers remain mixed. Inefficiencies and a culture of "gaming" the system have also been observed, raising questions about the overall effectiveness of accreditation programs and assessment processes. Consequently, exploration of other formats of accreditation assessment, such as short-notice accreditation assessment, has arisen. From July 1, 2023, the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare mandated that Australian public and private hospitals must engage in short-notice accreditation assessment. Objective: This study aims to explore the impact of short-notice accreditation assessment on hospitals, both in terms of safety and quality indicators, and organizational culture. A mixed methods design will be used to investigate these impacts. Methods: Quantitative safety and quality indicators will be drawn from a regional health service prior to and following its first short-notice accreditation assessment cycle. From the same site, staff will be invited to complete the Patient Safety Culture Survey and participate in semistructured interviews. Using Schein's Culture Framework as an organizational culture model, the study will examine observable outcomes (artifacts, behaviors, and indicators) alongside staff perceptions and experiences (norms and values) to form an understanding of underlying assumptions and beliefs about short-notice accreditation assessment processes. Quantitative data will be analyzed through cross-tabulation, trend analysis, and other statistical techniques, while qualitative data will be synthesized to provide a comprehensive understanding. Results: This protocol outlines the planned evaluation of short-notice accreditation assessment and its influence on patient safety and quality culture within a regional health service. Data collection is underway, with preintervention surveys being completed, and recruitment open for postintervention interviews. The study is expected to generate new knowledge on how this accreditation assessment process affects patient safety and quality culture of a regional and a rural hospital. Conclusions: The findings will inform health policy on the suitability and long-term viability of short-notice accreditation assessment as an approach to ensuring safe, high-quality health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.