ArticleAmerican journal of public health2026
Rosemary Collaboratory: A Policy, Systems, and Environmental Approach to Understanding and Addressing Health Inequities for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, United States.
Article in American journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) face significantly poorer health outcomes and experience greater health disparities compared with people without IDD, in part because of health system failures. This article summarizes health system assessments completed in the United States at the national level and in 3 states (Pennsylvania, Washington, and Wisconsin) to identify existing barriers and gaps. To reflect the US health architecture, there is also a discussion of particularly relevant national or federal policy features that influence health equity for people with IDD. Despite existing federal legislation, there are significant opportunities for improvement across all components of the health system, at both federal and state levels. One of the areas of most significant state-level innovation has to do with supported decision-making and alternatives to guardianship, demonstrating that there is precedent for state leadership. States should continue to treat federal legislation as the floor of protection, rather than the ceiling, and pursue further reforms that promote health equity for people with IDD. (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.