ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
One-dimensional computational circulatory models: a scoping review.
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputational modeling of human circulatory system has evolved significantly in recent decades. Among the various modeling strategies, one-dimensional (1D) models have emerged as alternatives to more complex models because of their balance between physiological accuracy and computational efficiency.
objectiveThis scoping review aimed to summarize and compare the studies on 1D computational models of the entire circulatory system, including those that incorporated additional 0D and 3D components.
methodsA systematic search was performed for studies on computational 1D models of the entire arterial tree. Studies were eligible if they employed 1D modeling either exclusively or in combination with 0D and/or 3D components. Article screening, data extraction, and analyses were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
resultsOut of the 6,841 records, 19 studies were included. Eleven articles presented strictly 1D nonlinear models, two used linear 1D models, and six employed multiscale frameworks that integrated 1D, 0D, and/or 3D components. Nonlinear 1D models consistently outperformed linear models in simulating large elastic arteries and pathological conditions, whereas linear models were effective in simulating small vessels under low-pressure variations. Multiscale models improve local hemodynamic details, but impose significantly higher computational costs.
conclusion1D models provide a robust and computationally efficient framework for simulating global cardiovascular hemodynamics. Although nonlinear and multiscale models enhance the physiological fidelity and adaptability to complex scenarios, their higher computational demands should be weighed against the available resources and specific clinical or research goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.