ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Feasibility of transthoracic echocardiography in the prone position with a low-cost adaptation: morphological, functional, and hemodynamic analysis.
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTransthoracic echocardiography is essential for hemodynamic assessment in critically ill patients; however, its use in the prone position remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of performing transthoracic echocardiography using a low-cost ultrasound table adaptation in the prone position.
methodsThis was a single-center, cross-sectional, comparative pilot study. Anthropometric and clinical data were collected along with echocardiographic image acquisition in the conventional and prone positions by the same operator. Feasibility was assessed by the acquisition of echocardiographic windows and the number of key variables in both positions. Comparative analyses were conducted for image quality, examination duration, and quantitative parameters such as variables related to systemic congestion, biventricular function, and cardiac output estimation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Fisher's exact test, binomial test, and false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons.
resultsEchocardiographic views were obtained for all patients in both positions. Imaging in the prone position allowed consistent acquisition of 16 of 17 key variables, with no significant difference. Image quality in the parasternal view was slightly reduced in the prone position but remained appropriate (p=0.015). Examinations in the prone position were on average 4.2 min longer (p=0.037). No significant differences were observed between the positions for any quantitative echocardiographic parameters, including chamber dimensions, systolic and diastolic function, cardiac output, and inferior vena cava assessment.
conclusionTransthoracic echocardiography in the prone position was feasible, with measurements comparable to those in the conventional position in healthy individuals undergoing routine evaluations in a regular echocardiography laboratory. Further studies are required to validate the accuracy and applicability of this method, particularly for patients in intensive care and emergency settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.