ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Regional and demographic disparities in low-risk hospital deliveries in Brazil's Public Health System.
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the volume, public funding, and in-hospital outcomes of vaginal deliveries and cesarean sections within the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS - Sistema Único de Saúde ) across regions and maternal age groups.
methodsThis retrospective, cross-sectional study presents a population-based analysis of low-risk vaginal and cesarean hospital deliveries within the SUS from 2009 to 2023 using publicly available data from the SUS Hospital Information System. Trends in delivery mode distribution were assessed using the chi-square test, whereas in-hospital mortality rates, length-of-stay, and average public financing were compared between the groups using the Mann-Whitney test.
resultsOver the study period, vaginal deliveries decreased by 39%, whereas cesarean sections increased by 3%, leading to a rising proportion of cesarean births within the SUS despite an overall decline in total deliveries in Brazil. The cesarean section rate increased from 32.4% in 2009 to 44.6% in 2023, and regional disparities were observed. Despite the SUS promoting vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancies, cesarean section rates increased across all states except Roraima. In-hospital mortality rates were numerically higher for cesarean sections, particularly among women aged ≥40 years, although statistical significance was not observed. Cesarean sections were also associated with a longer length-of-stay and higher public funding.
conclusionDespite policies favoring vaginal births, rising cesarean section rates in the SUS reveal persistent structural, cultural, and logistical challenges. Higher public funding and longer hospital stays add to the healthcare burden. Strengthening primary care, expanding Normal Birth Centers, and optimizing cesarean section use are crucial for balanced and accessible maternity care across Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.