ArticleRevista de saude publica2026
Precarious work and Covid-19: repercussions on the health of primary health care workers.
Article in Revista de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TQT-Covid-19 Study: coping strategies and lessons learned for the future.Revista de saude publica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze how the Covid-19 pandemic influenced the working conditions and health of primary health care professionals in a health district of a capital city in Northeast Brazil.
methodsThis was a qualitative study using the theoretical framework of the health work process, part of the formative research of the project "Expansion of testing, quarantine, e-health and telemonitoring strategies in the fight against Covid-19 in Brazil" (TQT Project). Data were collected between December 2021 and March 2022 in a health district of a capital city in Northeast Brazil to support the implementation of the aforementioned project. Twenty-two interviews and three focus groups with 19 participants, all health care professionals from the health district under study, were analyzed for their content.
resultsThe pandemic context caused repercussions on working conditions and health, with the effects of precarious working conditions and the implementation of protective measures being highlighted as key elements in the dimension of working conditions. Mental suffering, the impact of gender issues, and post-Covid-19 conditions were identified as the main elements contributing to the illness of the professionals.
conclusionThe evidence set gathered in this study indicates that various stressors emerge or worsen intensely and inseparably among health care professionals, clearly demonstrating the relationship between the pandemic and the health-disease process of these workers. Therefore, it is imperative to reverse the situation of illness among workers in the post-pandemic period to mitigate its effects in the medium and long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.