ArticleChemical research in toxicology2026
Neuroprotection Against a Panel of Toxicants via a Novel Analog of the Natural Product Fraxinellone.
Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans are exposed to a myriad of environmental pollutants, with recent evidence indicating several of these toxicants serve as risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders and neurodegenerative diseases. Given this, there is a need for both interventional and protective strategies; however, of concern, the mechanistic targets of these environmental pollutants are variable or unknown in some cases. A prior report indicated that analogs of the natural product fraxinellone act as potent NRF2 activators, mitigating excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and Glu toxicity in vitro. Using one of the most effective fraxinellone analogs (i.e., analog 2) for NRF2 activation identified, we sought to determine the range of protection, in vitro, against a panel of neurotoxicants with varying mechanisms for adverse effects, including 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), organochlorine pollutants, and a fungicide. The data for analog 2 were compared to those for a structurally similar but inactive analog (i.e., analog 1). The dose-response for each toxicant with PC12 and SH-SY5Y cell lines was determined. Interestingly, the fraxinellone analog provided significant protection against all agents screened: 6-OHDA, dieldrin, benomyl, PCB52 hydroxy and sulfate metabolites, and rotenone. The extent to which the fraxinellone analog mitigated toxicity varied for each toxicant. In all cases, pretreatment with analog 2 significantly decreased total cellular ROS production, and in addition, generation of mitochondrial ROS via rotenone was mitigated. Furthermore, analog 2 provides some degree of restoration of cell viability following rotenone insult. In summary, our data indicate that an analog of the natural product fraxinellone potently inhibited ROS production and toxicity, thereby protecting cells against a panel of agents with varying mechanisms from adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.