ArticleJournal of radiation research2026
Proton beam therapy for external auditory canal and middle ear cancers.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few studies have evaluated the efficacy of proton beam therapy (PBT) for external auditory canal cancer (EACC) or middle ear cancer (MEC). Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of PBT for EACC and MEC. Between December 2009 and August 2018, 15 patients (seven males and eight females) underwent PBT for EACC or MEC. The median patient age was 64 years (range: 40-82 years). Ten patients had EACC, and five patients had MEC. PBT was administered using the passive scattering method. The median total dose of the BED10 was 88.8 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) (range = 85.6-99.3 Gy [RBE]), administered in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) (α/β = 10). Chemotherapy was conducted in 14 patients, systemic chemotherapy in five and intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy in nine. The median follow-up period for all patients was 60 months (range: 7-136 months). The 3-year overall survival, local control and progression free survival rates were 65%, 66.7% and 53.3%, respectively. Four patients had grade 3 hearing impairment owing to late toxicity. However, these patients had hearing impairment before treatment as well. No grade 4 or higher late toxicity was observed during the follow-up period. PBT is an effective treatment for EACC and MEC with tolerable toxicity, including in the setting of combined chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.